Crisis hostage management/criminal justice Essay

It is saddening when e actually sidereal day we read ab out reports of warrantor pickings happening all over the world. Reports from jurisprudence force intelligence departments across the world assign that, security fetching fibres ranges from seize of infants to taking hostage of crew of big pissing vessels, as is rampant along the bound of Somalia in Africa. US is not an exeption, infact galore(postnominal) slip of papers of hostage taking commence been describe especially in the southern section states. An example of hostage taking geek happened at Hillary Rodham Clintons campaign offices in Rochester, untried Hampshire.A nicely dressed colour haired man known as Leeland Eisenberg walked into the offices on a Friday demanding to talk to Hillary Clinton around fate him get mental health guard and ended up taking at least tailfin people hostage including an infant. The ordeal went on until night when the ending hostage walked to freedom and the hostage take r peacefully surrendered to the practice of law. Although Eisenberg had a packet of highway flares tape-recorded on his body, when he was persuaded by the states police negotiator he gave up and surrendered to hit police team. match to Hillary Clinton as she address a press conference by and by in Portsmouth that night, Eisenberg was in need of abet and was seeking attention in dead the wrong way. Eisenberg was held on state charges of kidnapping and reckless conduct, federal charges were being considered. (http//www. msnbc. msn. com/id/22043358). some other hostage taking relative incidence occurred in Louisville whereby a mother (Gail Lynn Coontz) killed her twain children patriarchal 14 and 10 years in their beds and later went to a college she attended with a taw before handing over the apparatus to the colleges health counselor.The threat at Louisville University College ended with no injuries about half(a) an hour later it began, but discipline officials asked p olice to check on the children, which were prepare dead with catalystshot wounds. Mrs. Coontz was taken to a psychiatric clinic and later taken to Louisville jail. According to university police, Maj. Kenny Brown, she was charged with terrorist threatening for pointing a gun at a police officer. (http//www. msnbc. msn. com/id/23827059). The two counts of hostage taking were very diverse from one another because the stolon case was carried out in a daft manner i. e.no violence was reported, the road flares posed some considerable hazard, had the curious decided to use them. The hostage taker was exactly trying to seek attention correspond to Hilary Clinton because he unconditionally released the hostages after thought process by a police negotiator. The insurgent case was a serious one, with the doubt having shot dead her two children ahead on. Its true that twain hostage taking incidences were perpetuated by people who were undergoing psychological problems. For instan ce Eisenberg had a court case filled by his wife for medicine abuse, assault, and verbal threats, while Mrs.Coontz was a windowpane and therefore was stressed by family burden. In both incidences of hostage taking, the hostage takers were persuaded into give up peacefully, i. e. they never put up any violent resistence. in realise of the US presidential terms insurance policy on hostage taking threats, based on yesteryear experience, making concessions that benefit hostage takers in exchange of release of hostages increased the danger that others will be taken hostage. At the same time the US government always makes every effort to tactual sensation the captors or even their representatives so as to secure the release of hostages.under topical US law, 18 USC 1203(act for prevention and punishment of the plague of hostage taking, enacted oct 1984),seizure of a US citizen as a hostage anywhere in the world is a crime and therefore subject to investigation by the Federal Bure au of Investigation and to prosecution by US authorities (http//www. state. gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2002/8190. htm. ) In the starting time incidence Eisenberg was sweet talked to by a state police negotiator into big(a) up and surrendering peacefully to the police. And in the sec case Mrs.Coontz although pointed a gun to police a officer she voluntarily gave out the gun to the college health counselor. This shows clearly that the negotiators vie their part professionally and with a share of patient. From both counts its evident that very minimal force was applied by the police to free the hostages. In the first incidence for instance, although police camped outside the create they never attempted to use extra force lest they provoke the hostage taker into doing a nasty action. Similarly, in the second incidence police played safe until Mrs. Coontz surrendered the gun to the college health counselor voluntarily.Therefore the outcomes of both cases of hostage taking were a victor on the part of police since no one taken hostage was hurt and the suspects were apprehended. The articles from which I extracted these two hostage taking counts were fairly written, providing detailed information about the hostage takers, and the hostage taking incidence. alone the part on negotiation amid the suspects and the negotiators was not well expounded in both counts. Readers would want to know the agreements leading to the change intensity of hostage takers and hence giving up. The writers withal gave very little coverage on police action about the incidences.The condition of the killings of the two children by their mother should have been provided . References A man takes more than five people hostage at Sen. Hilary Clintons campaign office in Rochester N, H, purchasable at 1) http//www. msnbc. msn. com/id/22043358 accessed on April 15, 2008 a mum takes terrorizes a college with a gun after killing her own two children, easy at 2)http//www. msnbc. msn. com/id/23827 059accessed on April 15, 2008 US policy on hostage taking threats, useable at 3) http//www. state. gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2002/8190. htm accessed on April 15, 2008